The EPA keeps in mind that these risk estimates do not call for extrapolation from high dose rates to low1. " I personally assume the straight no-threshold version is over traditional, and does waste a lot of money that could be better spent," says Cynthia McCollough, a radiologist. The HPS's official position on radon, nonetheless, still drops in line with the radon risk recommended by the straight no limit model2. Radon is almost everywhere, yet it does not normally posture much of a threat because it spreads right into the open air.
Some houses draw even more radon into the home than others because of higher pressure differences offered paths. The typical radon level in Minnesota is greater than three times more than the U.S. radon level. Minnesota residences are closed or heated most of the year, which can cause higher degrees of radon. In Minnesota, more than get more info 2 in five homes have radon degrees that present a considerable health danger.
